object marker造句
例句与造句
- Some person categories lack a subject and / or object marker.
- Overt object markers are omitted for most other subjects.
- Object markers and subject markers are used in the language, and object markers appear before subject markers.
- Object markers and subject markers are used in the language, and object markers appear before subject markers.
- Object pronouns must have an object marker particle ( in colloquial, in formal ) attached immediately after the pronoun.
- It's difficult to find object marker in a sentence. 用object marker造句挺难的
- Of these suffixes, the plural marker is found first, followed by any possessive markers followed by the direct object marker.
- As Gareth says, there is little meaning to ??? other than " fill ", and ?? is merely an object marker.
- Direct inverse languages such as Mapudungun distinguish subject and object on verbs not by different subject and object markers, but via a hierarchy of persons.
- is acceptable since the object marker ( underlyingly just, with epenthetic changed to because it immediately precedes in the disjunct zone ) is part of the verb, but
- So far the only actual examples I have found are in the 3rd person object marker in Takelma, which is the suffix k?wa which is realized on the verb.
- In the case of transitive verbs, the subject markers are suffixed to the verb root ( cf . nominative suffixes ), while the object markers are prefixed ( cf . absolutive prefixes ).
- For example, in the TI paradigm ( animate : inanimate ) when there is a second or third person plural subject, object markers are present in the verb stem, but they are number-indifferent.
- The ng- in the second example above is an object marker which blocks the reading of the sentence from being it was a turtle that was eating my sister . This is some evidence towards an accusative reading.
- That is, if I were to say something that would always use D?/ | ?in written Korean, then should I include the verb-object marker in my utterance ? undated comment added 16 : 36, 2 April 2009 ( UTC ).
- In older forms of the Persian language,-@ > could indicate both direct and indirect objects and some phrases used in modern Persian does not use the direct object marker as a suffix on the noun, but rather, as a stand-alone morpheme.
更多例句： 下一页